advertisement
 
 
  advanced

 
click to visit United Bearing Company

The eBearing News
December 17, 2002


U.S. Calculating CDSOA
Payouts to Bearing Manufacturers
copyright © 2002 eBearing Inc.

The Timken Company (Canton, Ohio) and the Torrington Company (Torrington, Connecticut) are poised to receive their 2002 payouts under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (the CDSOA or Byrd Amendment). These were the only bearing manufacturers to collect under the CDSOA in 2001, and Timken is in the midst of acquiring Torrington from parent Ingersoll-Rand.

The CDSOA (see our CDSOA section for more information) essentially takes all of the antidumping and countervailing duties collected by U.S. Customs and sets them aside for distribution to "affected domestic producers" who participated in the complaints which resulted in the duties.

While the World Trade Organization and several important U.S. trading partners have come out strongly against the CDSOA as an improper domestic subsidy, the U.S. is reluctant to repeal the contested act. So it remains in place for at least another year.

The amounts paid out this year have not yet been revealed by Customs or the companies involved. However, eBearing has researched the anticipated payouts and calculated the total funds available for disbursement under the most likely payout schedules. The process should help you to understand where the money comes from and in what proportions.

In the U.S. Government's fiscal 2002 (June 1, 2001 through May 31, 2002), Customs reported that it collected approximately $270 million in countervailing and antidumping duties. On a product/country basis, amounts collected for the year varied from as little as $0.07 (chrome lug nuts from Taiwan) to as much as $67.6 million (candles from China).

For the approximately 37 antidumping and countervailing duty orders involving bearings, we calculated the total collected as approximately $93.1 million. This is the amount potentially available for claim by Timken and Torrington. Note, too, that almost 35% of all dumping duties collected by the United States involve bearings.

By mid-September, the bearing companies must petition U.S. Customs to collect what they believe is their share of that $93.1 million. Customs then reviews the claims, allocates payouts based on their own calculations, and writes checks to those companies.

Following is the list of cases, descriptions, companies involved and approximate dollar amounts collected and available for claim. In a few cases, information is missing or incomplete because U.S. Customs does not make the information publicly available in any clear or concise way. Where "Eligible to Collect" is blank, those are usually Timken and Torrington. Please also note that where Timken is listed it often refers to the Miniature Precision Bearing (MPB) division.

Commerce Case Description Eligible to Collect Available to Disburse
A-412-201 U.K. non-TRB   518,889.45
A-412-203 U.K. non-TRB   32,865.88
A-427-201 France non-TRB   3,509,729.04
A-427-203 France non-TRB   181,234.25
A-427-205 France non-TRB   70,282.98
A-428-201 Germany non-TRB   10,118,826.71
A-428-203 Germany non-TRB   9,252,339.17
A-428-205 Germany non-TRB   1,137,364.09
A-437-601 Hungary TRB Timken, Torrington 5,643.11
A-475-201 Italy non-TRB   1,651,704.03
A-475-203 Italy non-TRB   7,787.22
A-485-602 Romania TRB Timken, Torrington 22,965.69
A-549-201 Thailand non-TRB   57.94
A-559-201 Singapore ball bearings   66,636.79
A-559-801 Singapore ball bearings Timken, Torrington 9.24
A-570-601 China TRB Timken, Torrington 2,437,114.91
A-588-054 Japan TRB under 4" Timken, others 5,257,820.90
A-588-201 Japan non-TRB   46,729,021.19
A-588-203 Japan non-TRB   1,464,831.07
A-588-205 Japan non-TRB   113,163.18
A-588-604 Japan TRB over 4" Timken, Torrington 10,498,883.40
        TOTAL     $ 93,100,000.00

Note these are the maximum funds potentially available for distribution; Customs will be not pay out the entire $93.1 million to Timken and Torrington.

A front page article in The Wall Street Journal on December 5, 2002 carried an in-depth analysis of the CDSOA. It covered the original intent, impact, future, and other aspects of the legislation. In addition, the article compared Torrington's and Timken's payments to those intended for the steel industry -- the industry originally expected to be helped by the CDSOA. As a steel manufacturer, Timken is in fact also eligible for CDSOA payments under several other steel categories.

printer-friendly version


- by Bruce A. Carr
from individual research,
tips and commercial sources.
Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.


Return to News Headlines

Have bearing industry news leads ?      Send them to news@eBearing.com


eBearing.com ... for everything that moves™
Entire contents Copyright 1999-2008, eBearing Inc. All rights reserved.
eBearing.com and "... for everything that moves" are registered trademarks of eBearing Inc.



click to visit QA1

eBearing.com ... for everything that moves™
Entire contents Copyright © 1999-2008, eBearing Inc. All rights reserved.
eBearing.com and "... for everything that moves" are registered trademarks of eBearing Inc.