|
|

|
|

|
The eBearing News
December 17, 2002
U.S. Calculating CDSOA Payouts to Bearing Manufacturers
copyright © 2002 eBearing Inc.
The Timken Company (Canton, Ohio) and the Torrington Company (Torrington, Connecticut)
are poised to receive their 2002 payouts under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act
of 2000 (the CDSOA or Byrd Amendment). These were the only bearing manufacturers to
collect under the CDSOA in 2001, and Timken is in the midst of acquiring Torrington from
parent Ingersoll-Rand.
The CDSOA
(see our CDSOA section for more
information) essentially takes all of the antidumping and countervailing duties collected
by U.S. Customs and sets them aside for distribution to "affected domestic producers" who
participated in the complaints which resulted in the duties.
While the World Trade Organization and several important U.S. trading partners have
come out strongly against the CDSOA as an improper domestic subsidy, the U.S. is
reluctant to repeal the contested act. So it remains in place for at least another year.
The amounts paid out this year have not yet been revealed by Customs or the
companies involved. However, eBearing has researched the anticipated payouts and
calculated the total funds available for disbursement under
the most likely payout schedules. The process should help you to understand
where the money comes from and in what proportions.
In the U.S. Government's fiscal 2002 (June 1, 2001 through May 31, 2002),
Customs reported that it collected approximately $270 million in countervailing
and antidumping duties. On a product/country basis, amounts collected for
the year varied from as little as $0.07 (chrome lug nuts from Taiwan) to as
much as $67.6 million (candles from China).
For the approximately 37 antidumping and countervailing duty orders
involving bearings, we calculated the total collected as
approximately $93.1 million. This is the amount potentially available for
claim by Timken and Torrington. Note, too, that almost 35% of all
dumping duties collected by the United States involve bearings.
By mid-September, the bearing companies must petition
U.S. Customs to collect what they believe is their
share of that $93.1 million. Customs then reviews the claims, allocates
payouts based on their own calculations, and writes checks to those companies.
Following is the list of cases, descriptions, companies involved and
approximate dollar amounts collected and available for claim. In a few cases,
information is missing or incomplete because U.S. Customs does not make
the information publicly available in any clear or concise way. Where
"Eligible to Collect" is blank, those are usually Timken and Torrington.
Please also note that where Timken is listed it often refers to the
Miniature Precision Bearing (MPB) division.
| Commerce Case |
Description |
Eligible to Collect |
Available to Disburse |
| A-412-201 |
U.K. non-TRB |
|
518,889.45 |
| A-412-203 |
U.K. non-TRB |
|
32,865.88 |
| A-427-201 |
France non-TRB |
|
3,509,729.04 |
| A-427-203 |
France non-TRB |
|
181,234.25 |
| A-427-205 |
France non-TRB |
|
70,282.98 |
| A-428-201 |
Germany non-TRB |
|
10,118,826.71 |
| A-428-203 |
Germany non-TRB |
|
9,252,339.17 |
| A-428-205 |
Germany non-TRB |
|
1,137,364.09 |
| A-437-601 |
Hungary TRB |
Timken, Torrington |
5,643.11 |
| A-475-201 |
Italy non-TRB |
|
1,651,704.03 |
| A-475-203 |
Italy non-TRB |
|
7,787.22 |
| A-485-602 |
Romania TRB |
Timken, Torrington |
22,965.69 |
| A-549-201 |
Thailand non-TRB |
|
57.94 |
| A-559-201 |
Singapore ball bearings |
|
66,636.79 |
| A-559-801 |
Singapore ball bearings |
Timken, Torrington |
9.24 |
| A-570-601 |
China TRB |
Timken, Torrington |
2,437,114.91 |
| A-588-054 |
Japan TRB under 4" |
Timken, others |
5,257,820.90 |
| A-588-201 |
Japan non-TRB |
|
46,729,021.19 |
| A-588-203 |
Japan non-TRB |
|
1,464,831.07 |
| A-588-205 |
Japan non-TRB |
|
113,163.18 |
| A-588-604 |
Japan TRB over 4" |
Timken, Torrington |
10,498,883.40 |
| |
|
TOTAL |
$ 93,100,000.00 |
Note these are the maximum funds potentially available for distribution;
Customs will be not pay out the entire $93.1 million
to Timken and Torrington.
A front page article in
The Wall Street Journal
on December 5, 2002
carried an in-depth analysis of the CDSOA. It covered the original intent,
impact, future, and other aspects of the legislation. In addition, the
article compared Torrington's and Timken's payments to those
intended for the steel industry -- the industry originally expected to be
helped by the CDSOA. As a steel manufacturer, Timken is in fact also eligible
for CDSOA payments under several other steel categories.
|
|
|
printer-friendly version
|
|
- by Bruce A. Carr
from individual research, tips and commercial sources.
Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.
|
|
eBearing.com ... for everything that moves
Entire contents Copyright 1999-2008, eBearing Inc. All rights reserved.
eBearing.com and "... for everything that moves" are registered
trademarks of eBearing Inc.
|
|
|

|
|
| |
eBearing.com ... for everything that moves
Entire contents Copyright © 1999-2008, eBearing Inc. All rights reserved.
eBearing.com and "... for everything that moves" are registered trademarks of eBearing Inc.
|
|
|